We discussed the idea of a weekly triager today at the weekly development meeting.
The rough idea is that one maintainer will be the primary person to help make sure that issues and PRs keep "moving" during the week that they are triaging. They're don't have to be responsible for things in the issue and PR queue for the week (unless they want to be); instead they're responsible for prompting the right people to do the right thing (if they can) on issues and PRs.
they're responsible for prompting the right people to do the right thing (if they can) on issues and PRs.
Regarding this part, we'll know if it's going well if:
In other words, the triager keeps the project's "heartbeat"
Because when do I not have them? 馃槃
And finally, one last feeling! I feel like everyone should weigh in on this idea, not just maintainers. But definitely including maintainers, since we are going to be responsible for a lot of this
Here is some prior art for issue triaging, from which I stole almost all of these ideas: https://gist.github.com/technosophos/c269362e154540b4bfc3bb2ac210df41#issue-triaging
Thanks for this @technosophos!
I think every contributor in our community is doing a pretty good job keeping up with PRs and issues for now, so I'm gonna close this issue. We can go try and fix something if it becomes a problem 馃槃
Most helpful comment
Here is some prior art for issue triaging, from which I stole almost all of these ideas: https://gist.github.com/technosophos/c269362e154540b4bfc3bb2ac210df41#issue-triaging
Thanks for this @technosophos!