@bradygaster is driving this work but the team needs to provide feedback.
Has anyone reviewed this? @halter73 @mikaelm12 @BrennanConroy ? @bradygaster can you link to the template here, if it's ready for review?
@anurse yes - @halter73 provided feedback and i respectfully didn't agree with @BrennanConroy's feedback, but that is primarily because i think BackgroundService is like, the second coming and we should make a bigger deal about it. 馃憤
And w.r.t. the templatized version, I will create that by EOW and submit it folks for review.
I am here to say that this is dope.
That's basically your job, right? 馃槤
It's the best way I know how to add value.
If the template isn't coming in actual template form until EOW, this won't land in time for preview4. Moving to preview5
Pre-triage notes:
Triage decision: Keeping it in, let's try to get this in for preview 5.
Bumping to preview 7 since we're still chugging on it.
After discussing this with @halter73 @davidfowl and more, we should scrap this. One suggestion was an OOB template set that would satisfy some of the use-case scenarios Zhidi and the others in the Azure SignalR Service team have struggled to satisfy. Suggestion was to try this out as an experiment to see if the community responds to having "starting points" for some of the canonical scenarios (chat, geo-placement of active connections, etc.). We can close this issue (leaving for triage/milestone review).
Most helpful comment
It's the best way I know how to add value.