Asdf: plugin-test returns false positive when used to test asdf-jq plugin

[AZMCode]

Describe the bug
Using plugin-test to test the asdf-jq plugin yields a positive result regardless of actual installation status

To Reproduce

Tell us what actions you performed before the issue occurred

Steps to reproduce the behavior:
In a linux box with asdf:
asdf plugin-test jq https://github.com/focused-labs/asdf-jq.git

Expected behavior

Test returns failure to install jq in linux. See this.

Actual behavior
console prints:
jq is already installed
Causing asdf-jq's CI to return a false positive.

Environment

OS: Linux

asdf version: v0.7.8-4a3e3d6

asdf plugins affected (if relevant): asdf-jq

asdf plugins installed: none

[RafalSkolasinski]

observed the same today

[danhper]

asdf latest jq seems to be returning an empty string, which is causing the issue.
This particular issue should be fixed by #772 but I am not sure if asdf latest jq fails because of an issue on asdf side or on asdf-jq side so please open a new issue if it seems to be on the asdf side.

[RafalSkolasinski]

@danhper would you please ping me once #772 is then merged and part of a release? I could test it then.

[jthegedus]

@RafalSkolasinski Once merged to master you can use asdf update --head to get the latest commit on master

[RafalSkolasinski]

@jthegedus Not sure where to actually open another issue if required - I only commented as I spotted the same issue when playing around so you guys have information the issue happens for other user too.

Anyway, after doing assdf update --head as you suggested there still seem to be problem with jq:

rskolasinski@machine42:~$ asdf latest jq
rskolasinski@machine42:~$ asdf install jq latest
jq  is already installed
rskolasinski@machine42:~$ asdf list jq
  No versions installed
rskolasinski@machine42:~$

[danhper]

asdf latest searches for versions that start by a number. All versions return by jq start by jq-, hence latest returns nothing. I would rather open an issue on the jq plugin side of things.

[AZMCode]

Already fixed in my PR. Thanks for the insight