Arctos: Error message just won't go away...

Created on 7 Sep 2018  Â·  5Comments  Â·  Source: ArctosDB/arctos

Issue Documentation is http://handbook.arctosdb.org/how_to/How-to-Use-Issues-in-Arctos.html

Describe the bug
Although I have added the "not the same as" relationship, I keep getting the "potential problems" red box on Robert L. Rausch

To Reproduce
See Robert L. Rausch

Expected behavior
I would expect that the relationship would mean no more "potential problem"

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
image

image

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Windows 10
  • Browser Firefox Quantum
  • Version 64.1.1

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

Priority
I would like to have this resolved by date: 2018-09-30

DisplaInterface Function-Agents

Most helpful comment

Then no reason to keep the red box.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 10:20 AM dustymc notifications@github.com wrote:

We introduced "who said" in ~2014.

Remarks are never a good substitute for relationships.

http://handbook.arctosdb.org/documentation/agent.html#creating--maintaining-agents

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1675#issuecomment-421066016,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOH0hB5WXzqwu1GIlQ5uzdVtrCJFh931ks5uaoXkgaJpZM4Wff7j
.

All 5 comments

I sort of think I like the information (it's not really an error - maybe it should be less red??) there even with relationships. Maybe whoever created the Robert L./Robert A. relationship didn't know what they were doing (in this case they did!), and I don't think it makes sense to completely trust the relationship and hide the data.

I think we should get rid of the box as too much annoying visual clutter,
which is excessive in Arctos already. If it is absolutely necessary to keep
reminding people that there is a potential duplicate that really isn't
because someone has already investigated it and concluded that this
individual is "not the same as", then perhaps we need to record
determination history. Who said it wasn't the same as? remarks?

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:22 AM, dustymc notifications@github.com wrote:

I sort of think I like the information (it's not really an error - maybe
it should be less red??) there even with relationships. Maybe whoever
created the Robert L./Robert A. relationship didn't know what they were
doing (in this case they did!), and I don't think it makes sense to
completely trust the relationship and hide the data.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1675#issuecomment-421046013,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOH0hPotNnAYYvrUaLypSif-n3y2qMioks5uanhEgaJpZM4Wff7j
.

We introduced "who said" in ~2014.

Remarks are never a good substitute for relationships.

http://handbook.arctosdb.org/documentation/agent.html#creating--maintaining-agents

Then no reason to keep the red box.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 10:20 AM dustymc notifications@github.com wrote:

We introduced "who said" in ~2014.

Remarks are never a good substitute for relationships.

http://handbook.arctosdb.org/documentation/agent.html#creating--maintaining-agents

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/ArctosDB/arctos/issues/1675#issuecomment-421066016,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOH0hB5WXzqwu1GIlQ5uzdVtrCJFh931ks5uaoXkgaJpZM4Wff7j
.

Trying to close stuff and I am returning to this:

I propose that the "not the same as" relationships SHOULD NOT trigger the "possible duplicate of" message. What is the point of establishing that these two people are not the same with the "not the same as" relationship if it doesn't stop this message?

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

Jegelewicz picture Jegelewicz  Â·  6Comments

acoconis picture acoconis  Â·  9Comments

AJLinn picture AJLinn  Â·  4Comments

acdoll picture acdoll  Â·  8Comments

DerekSikes picture DerekSikes  Â·  3Comments