Angular-oauth2-oidc: Error on npm run serve:ssr

Created on 26 Mar 2020  Β·  36Comments  Β·  Source: manfredsteyer/angular-oauth2-oidc

Describe the bug
I'm trying to build and serve a local app in ssr mode but npm run server:ssr crash.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. npm install angular-oauth2-oidc --save
  2. add OAuthModule.forRoot() on AppModule
  3. npm run build:ssr && npm run serve:ssr or npm run dev:ssr

Expected behavior
Node Express server listening on http://localhost:4000

Additional context
ReferenceError: Document is not defined at Module../node_modules/angular-oauth2-oidc/fesm2015/angular-oauth2-oidc.js

bug investigation-needed

Most helpful comment

I created a new Angular 9 project and added SSR, keeping everything default.

Then as a test, I injected the DOCUMENT token in AppComponent and use it in ngOnInit(). I could not reproduce the problem.

However, as soon as I added angular-oauth2-oidc and OAuthModule.forRoot in AppModule I got the error (Document is not defined) on build.

Seems to me there is something specific with angular-oauth2-oidc. If I get some more time I will do some more testing.

All 36 comments

A temporary workaround is to use version 8.0.2 if that's possible.

any news about this issue ?
i'm using angular 9.1 and i'm facing the same problem ..

hi @kristofdegrave , thanks for taking a loot at it πŸš€
event if your fix seems necessary to avoid later issues, it doesn't seem to fix the entire problem..

I used your fix on my local fork and test on my app with a little npm link and still have the same issue. It seems, imo, that the Document isn't injected at all ..

Documents\Workspace\poc-front\dist\activities\server\main.js:2540
        Document])
        ^

ReferenceError: Document is not defined
    at Module.../../poc/angular-oauth2-oidc/dist/lib/__ivy_ngcc__/fesm2015/angular-oauth2-oidc.js (Documents\Workspace\poc-front\dist\activities\server\main.js:2540:9)

Seeing your error are you using this library at server side? Our is this still your client that is giving the error?

There seems to be a setDocument method to set the DOCUMENT in Ivy, normally Ivy takes care of this, but it seems in your case not. https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/e511bfcab586a94cdae1491e0ec194141445578b/packages/core/src/render3/interfaces/document.ts

It is a private function exposed in the core package, maybe try to set the document yourself. https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/fb92f5de1adc8dccbb947a09b34cb1bcc6b41e7f/packages/core/src/core_render3_private_export.ts#L257

Seeing your error are you using this library at server side? Our is this still your client that is giving the error?

this error occurs at build time when building with ssr (npm run build:ssr or npm run dev:ssr)

There seems to be a setDocument method to set the DOCUMENT in Ivy, normally Ivy takes care of this, but it seems in your case not. https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/e511bfcab586a94cdae1491e0ec194141445578b/packages/core/src/render3/interfaces/document.ts

It is a private function exposed in the core package, maybe try to set the document yourself. https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/fb92f5de1adc8dccbb947a09b34cb1bcc6b41e7f/packages/core/src/core_render3_private_export.ts#L257

i will try to check if i can manage to have something that works this, thanks @kristofdegrave

What is in your main.ts file? How are you bootstrapping your appmodule?

if you are using platformDynamicServer to bootstrap, try something like this:

platformDynamicServer([{
           provide: INITIAL_CONFIG,
           useValue: {document: '<html><head></head><body><app></app></body></html>'}
         }]);

This comes from one of the angular test. I asume that the document should contain your index.html representation. https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/a0d16dcfea80f089379e4f6b9a4da68790cc1436/packages/platform-server/test/integration_spec.ts#L469-L482

We setup the project with the Nest plugin. In our main.ts, we use platformBrowserDynamic.

We tried adding the INITIAL_CONFIG option, we still have the error.

import { enableProdMode } from '@angular/core';
import { platformBrowserDynamic } from '@angular/platform-browser-dynamic';

import { AppModule } from './app/app.module';
import { environment } from './environments/environment';
import { INITIAL_CONFIG } from '@angular/platform-server';

if (environment.production) {
  enableProdMode();
}

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
  platformBrowserDynamic([
    {
      provide: INITIAL_CONFIG,
      useValue: {
        document: '<html><head></head><body><app></app></body></html>',
      },
    },
  ])
    .bootstrapModule(AppModule)
    .catch((err) => console.error(err));
});

I have just create a new ssr projet with nest. And I inject the DOCUMENT token in my AppComponent.
And in this use case, I do not have any errors. :s

Did you import the BrowserModule in your AppModule? This can also be a reason. This defines a document ... https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/b01084910266deaa7d8e4424398062e6905199e8/packages/platform-browser/src/browser.ts#L42

Did you import the BrowserModule in your AppModule? This can also be a reason. This defines a document ... https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/b01084910266deaa7d8e4424398062e6905199e8/packages/platform-browser/src/browser.ts#L42

yes it is :

@NgModule({
  declarations: [AppComponent],
  imports: [
    BrowserModule.withServerTransition({ appId: 'serverApp' }),
....

I have just create a new ssr projet with nest. And I inject the DOCUMENT token in my AppComponent.
And in this use case, I do not have any errors. :s

Can you see what the difference is in setup between the original and the new one?

@kristofdegrave In fact, I have an error. It was not very clear last time I checked this issue.

this.debug is not a function

Not very useful :s

The error we have with oidc is about Document with a capitalized D. So it means the DOM object Document is missing. Am I right ? That's normal because we are on the service side. So this class do not exist.

But I can not find any documentation about this issue on the Angular Universal documentation :s . Should we import an extra NPM module like domino ?

The error we have with oidc is about Document with a capitalized D. So it means the DOM object Document is missing. Am I right ? That's normal because we are on the service side. So this class do not exist.

Or it would mean that he has issues with the type Document. This is a type that should be defined inside typescript lib

But I can not find any documentation about this issue on the Angular Universal documentation :s . Should we import an extra NPM module like domino ?

About this subject I know nothing :)

I'm getting the error as well, working with angular-oauth2-oidc v9 (Angular 9.1.0). At the moment now sure why.

ReferenceError: Document is not defined
    at Module../node_modules/angular-oauth2-oidc/fesm2015/angular-oauth2-oidc.js (C:\***\dist\***\server\main.js:206143:9)

The line it is referring to in main.js:

OAuthService = Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__decorate"])([ 
...
...
[_angular_core__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__["NgZone"],
        _angular_common_http__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__["HttpClient"],
        OAuthStorage,
        ValidationHandler,
        AuthConfig,
        UrlHelperService,
        OAuthLogger,
        HashHandler,
        Document])      <--------
], OAuthService);

Looks like he can't resolve the type Document normally this should be part of the typescript library.

Seems in this post they get the same issue (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50517138/ng-bootstrap-referenceerror-document-is-not-defined)

But if that is the case I would solve it like that, because angular provides it's own solution using the platform-server (https://angular.io/api/platform-server). I would advise to use the
platformDynamicServer instead of platformBrowserDynamic in your main.server.ts

I created a new Angular 9 project and added SSR, keeping everything default.

Then as a test, I injected the DOCUMENT token in AppComponent and use it in ngOnInit(). I could not reproduce the problem.

However, as soon as I added angular-oauth2-oidc and OAuthModule.forRoot in AppModule I got the error (Document is not defined) on build.

Seems to me there is something specific with angular-oauth2-oidc. If I get some more time I will do some more testing.

Here is a workaround fix, removing the Document type from the inject token doesn't throw the error.

At the moment not sure why, what do you think?

See my fork here https://github.com/Exocomp/angular-oauth2-oidc/blob/master/projects/lib/src/oauth-service.ts#L115

However, this creates the side effect of not being able to use intellisense for document.

Maybe try the following:
Create a new interface extending Document Document2 for example and export this one in the public API also use Document2 in the authservice constructor. This way the type gets exported and maybe this solves the issue

Another try, does your ssr tsconfig contain the dom value in the lib property? Inspect the whole tree for this ​"​lib​"​:​ [​"​es2015​"​, ​"​dom​"​],

https://basarat.gitbook.io/typescript/type-system/lib.d.ts#lib-option

By default the Angular CLI uses:

"lib": [
  "es2018",
  "dom"
]

I have just added this in my tsconfig.server.json, and I still have the error

"lib": ["DOM", "ES2015"],

I have the same issue, but as MrFoster pointed out, reverting back to 8.0.2 worked for now.

Same here, can't go back to 8.x because I'm on angular ivy / 9 and I can't release this because we're using SSR

In the mean time, I created a new library with the Document type removed (thanks @Exocomp ).

https://www.npmjs.com/package/@elgerm/angular-oauth2-oidc

It's based on the latest master but the versioning is still on 9.1. I've tested several stuff that relies on document like refresh token and it all seems to work.

Now at least I can use it in production.

Dumb question, but out of curiosity, is there something in particular that doesn't work when using 8.x? I have a similar requirement of using this library with angular 9 and SSR, and it _seems_ to be working ok. You actually have a workable solution, which is the way to go, but again I was just curious. I know we're supposed to use the matching version, but I'm not sure how to go about finding out what would break, or at least not be guaranteed to work, if using an older package version with the newer angular version.

Not sure, I started using it with v9, then tried 8.0.3 and got lots of
errors. So that made me fork and β€œfix” the v9 version

On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 18:43, mikg2003 notifications@github.com wrote:

Dumb question, but out of curiosity, is there something in particular that
doesn't work when using 8.x? I have a similar requirement of using this
library with angular 9 and SSR, and it seems to be working ok. You
actually have a workable solution, which is the way to go, but again I was
just curious. I know we're supposed to use the matching version, but I'm
not sure how to go about finding out what would break, or at least not be
guaranteed to work, if using an older package version with the newer
angular version.

β€”
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/manfredsteyer/angular-oauth2-oidc/issues/773#issuecomment-625368127,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAW3SSSY22DXVA3APMXRWLTRQLQMTANCNFSM4LULXJAQ
.

still no news about this issue ? i've tried some fixes on my side but without any luck yet ..

Yes no news :(

I don't use angular-oauth2-oidc but I am getting this error anyway. So it is something else for me. But was I led to this page via google search for "this.debug is not a function"

We were able to work around this, for now, by adding Document to the global object when running on the server. For example, add

(global as any).Document = (global as any).Document || {};

at the beginning of your main.server.ts. Be careful to add this in a file that is included only on the server.

I have also added a PR for this #853.

We were able to work around this, for now, by adding Document to the global object when running on the server. For example, add

(global as any).Document = (global as any).Document || {};

at the beginning of your main.server.ts. Be careful to add this in a file that is included only on the server.

I have also added a PR for this #853.

obviously not a long term fix, but this workaround works well on our side too, well done @JohannesHuster

Hi there,

I was evaluating whether to use this library in my solution because I am using (the) other oidc client option and facing some weird issues regarding token storage at server side (and protected modules CanLoad)...

Well, for all of you that are facing issues with document, window and any other browser APIs here is my advice:

  • Use domino to declare those global vars
  • Here is the most important thing: USE IT BEFORE IMPORTING App ServerModule from main.server

As an example (a working example indeed):

import { APP_BASE_HREF } from '@angular/common';
import '@angular/localize/init';
import { ngExpressEngine } from '@nguniversal/express-engine';
import * as express from 'express';
import { existsSync } from 'fs';
import { join } from 'path';
import 'zone.js/dist/zone-node';

// THIS FIX MOST OF THE COMMON ISSUES WITH SSR:
const enDistFolder = join(process.cwd(), 'dist/browser/en');

// Emulate browser APIs
const domino = require('domino');
const fs = require('fs');
const templateA = fs.readFileSync(join(enDistFolder, 'index.html')).toString();

const win = domino.createWindow(templateA);
console.log('win');
win.Object = Object;
console.log('Object');
win.Math = Math;
console.log('Math');

global['window'] = win;
global['document'] = win.document;
global['Event'] = win.Event;
console.log('declared Global Vars....');

/** I need to avoid sorting this line */
// USE CTRL+P -> SAVE WITHOUT FORMATTING
/// --> import { AppServerModule } from './main.server';
import { AppServerModule } from './main.server';
/// --> import { AppServerModule } from './main.server';///
/** I need to avoid sorting this line */

// The Express app is exported so that it can be used by serverless Functions.
export function app() {
  const server = express();
  const distFolder = join(process.cwd(), 'dist/browser');
  const indexHtml = existsSync(join(distFolder, 'index.original.html')) ? 'index.original.html' : 'index';

  // Our Universal express-engine (found @ https://github.com/angular/universal/tree/master/modules/express-engine)
  server.engine('html', ngExpressEngine({
    bootstrap: AppServerModule,
  }));

  server.set('view engine', 'html');
  server.set('views', distFolder);

  // Example Express Rest API endpoints
  // server.get('/api/**', (req, res) => { });
  // Serve static files from /browser
  server.get('*.*', express.static(distFolder, {
    maxAge: '1y'
  }));

  server.use('/robots.txt', express.static('/en/robots.txt'));
  server.use('/ads.txt', express.static('/en/ads.txt'));

  // // // All regular routes use the Universal engine
  // // server.get('*', (req, res) => {
  // //   res.render(indexHtml, { req, providers: [{ provide: APP_BASE_HREF, useValue: req.baseUrl }] });
  // // });

  // All regular routes use the Universal engine
  server.get('*', (req, res) => {
    // this is for i18n
    const supportedLocales = ['en', 'es'];
    const defaultLocale = 'es';
    const matches = req.url.match(/^\/([a-z]{2}(?:-[A-Z]{2})?)\//);

    // check if the requested url has a correct format '/locale' and matches any of the supportedLocales
    const locale = (matches && supportedLocales.indexOf(matches[1]) !== -1) ? matches[1] : defaultLocale;

    res.render(`${locale}/index`, { req });

    // // AS A POC WE WANT TO RENDER ENG VERSION ONLY:
    // // res.render(`en/index`, { req });
  });

  return server;
}

function run() {
  const port = process.env.PORT || 4000;

  // Start up the Node server
  const server = app();
  server.listen(port, () => {
    console.log(`Node Express server listening on http://localhost:${port}`);
  });
}

// Webpack will replace 'require' with '__webpack_require__'
// '__non_webpack_require__' is a proxy to Node 'require'
// The below code is to ensure that the server is run only when not requiring the bundle.
declare const __non_webpack_require__: NodeRequire;
const mainModule = __non_webpack_require__.main;
const moduleFilename = mainModule && mainModule.filename || '';
if (moduleFilename === __filename || moduleFilename.includes('iisnode')) {
  run();
}

export * from './main.server';

Note that this code is using i18n but I left the original request handler.

I hope it helps, I spent a huge amount of time fixing my own issues after Angular 9 migration.

Thank you sharing your solution with browser APIs @JuanGarciaCarmona :-) Reading through your answer and this issue again, I realized that it might be helpful to separate the 3 different case-sensitive spellings of "Document" used in this issue:

  • document: Browser API. Not available on the server.
  • DOCUMENT: Angular InjectionToken for safe access to document.
  • Document: TypeScript Type. Constructor parameter types (that are also classes) can be used by Angular for Dependency Injection.

The problem described in this issue has to do with the last spelling ("Document") and seems to have something to do with Dependency Injection in Ivy. When compiling TypeScript to JavaScript this type information would normally not be represented in any way in the JS output. However, in the output from the Angular Compiler (at least when enabling Ivy) there is a reference to Document (Comments are mine):

// Universal main.js
// ...
OAuthService = Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__decorate"])([ Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__param"])(2, Object(_angular_core__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__["Optional"])()),
    Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__param"])(3, Object(_angular_core__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__["Optional"])()),
    Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__param"])(4, Object(_angular_core__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__["Optional"])()),
    Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__param"])(7, Object(_angular_core__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__["Optional"])()),
    Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__param"])(8, Object(_angular_core__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__["Inject"])(_angular_common__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__["DOCUMENT"])),
    Object(tslib__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__["__metadata"])("design:paramtypes", [_angular_core__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__["NgZone"],
        _angular_common_http__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__["HttpClient"],
        OAuthStorage,
        ValidationHandler,
        AuthConfig,
        UrlHelperService,
        OAuthLogger,
        HashHandler,
        Document]) // --> Reference Error since Document is never declared (where this scope could access it)
], OAuthService);
// ...

This works for the references above Document, because they are declared in a surrounding scope. This might be an Angular bug, but so far I haven't been able to reproduce the problem with a clean Angular library. I might find the time to look into this more and would then open an issue in the Angular repo, if I manage to reproduce the behavior.

Thanks for all the information and solutions provided in this thread.

Perhaps this also helps: Meanwhile, the Angular Universal team published a new API using jsDOM. This makes using libs that have been primarily written for browser usage easier. You can try this new API out using ng add @nguniversal/common.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

PaulienVa picture PaulienVa  Β·  4Comments

zulander1 picture zulander1  Β·  4Comments

bitbaggi picture bitbaggi  Β·  3Comments

PandaaAgency picture PandaaAgency  Β·  3Comments

prmces picture prmces  Β·  4Comments