Angular CLI: 6.0.0
Node: 9.11.1
OS: darwin x64
Angular: 6.0.0
... animations, cdk, cli, common, compiler, compiler-cli, core
... forms, http, language-service, material, platform-browser
... platform-browser-dynamic, router
Package Version
-----------------------------------------------------------
@angular-devkit/architect 0.6.0
@angular-devkit/build-angular 0.6.0
@angular-devkit/build-optimizer 0.6.0
@angular-devkit/core 0.3.2
@angular-devkit/schematics 0.6.0
@ngtools/webpack 6.0.0
@schematics/angular 0.6.0
@schematics/update 0.6.0
rxjs 6.1.0
typescript 2.7.2
webpack 4.7.0
When I develop an electron app (and thus have access to Node's fs
module), I can't access node modules because typescript or webpack isn't able to resolve it.
import * as fs from 'fs'
I get an error while building the application ng build
:
WARNING in ./node_modules/zone.js/dist/zone-mix.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'fs' in '/Users/marc/bude/project/node_modules/zone.js/dist'
ERROR in ./src/main/home.ts
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'os' in '/Users/marc/bude/project/src/main'
ERROR in ./src/main/home.ts
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'path' in '/Users/marc/bude/project/src/main'
....
I'd like to be able to use Node's modules and define somewhere in the angular.json configuration to allow certain modules (in other words: exclude them from the build process, as the Node runtime provides that stuff).
In Angular 5 I was able to eject
and add in the webpack.config.js
following lines at the root level:
"externals": {
"mongodb": 'require("mongodb")',
"fs": 'require("fs")',
},
However since Anuglar 6 does not provide an eject anymore, I'm not able to use that old webpack.config.json from v5 anymore. To make Angular 6 workable in Electron I need to be able to use a webpack.config.js again or maybe a config option in angular.json that allows me to define webpack's externals
.
I cannot use handlebarjs for the same reason :(
It's a blocker to upgrade to ng6
I've been running into the same problem. Actually, I only need to use ng eject
though to get externals to work and would prefer using angular-cli directly rather than having to eject.
So, at least for me, an externals
option for the angular-cli.json/angular.json would help a lot and might also be a quick fix for this specific problem.
I've been running into the same problem. For ng serve
, I get an error:
ERROR in ./node_modules/content-disposition/index.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'path' in 'D:\Sources\SSIV\Projects\Portal\angular\node_modules\content-disposition'
As a temporary solution, I changed var basename = require('path').basename
to var basename = require('path-browserify').basename
in the module content-disposition.
I suspect I'm getting the same error using libsodium-sumo. After upgrading to angular 6 I get
ERROR in ./node_modules/libsodium-sumo/dist/modules-sumo/libsodium-sumo.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'path' in '/home/david/Projects/passit-frontend/node_modules/libsodium-sumo/dist/modules-sumo'
Should be easily reproducable on this branch.
Frustratingly, the path module isn't used at all in libsodium.js when used in a browser - it exists only when used in node. It's presence seems to trigger this error.
If I delete references to path, everything works including libsodium crypto.
Same issue... After attempting to upgrade to angular-cli v6, I get the following when attempting to run ng serve
:
WARNING in ./node_modules/sax/lib/sax.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'stream' in '/Users/alockwood/ShapeShifter/node_modules/sax/lib'
ERROR in ./node_modules/svgo/lib/svgo/js2svg.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'os' in '/Users/alockwood/ShapeShifter/node_modules/svgo/lib/svgo'
ERROR in ./node_modules/jszip/lib/readable-stream-browser.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'stream' in '/Users/alockwood/ShapeShifter/node_modules/jszip/lib'
Same issue here when using ng serve
WARNING in ./node_modules/xml2js/node_modules/sax/lib/sax.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'stream' in 'C:\Develop\djjb-news-reader\node_modules\xml2js\node_modules\sax\lib'
ERROR in ./node_modules/xml2js/lib/parser.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'timers' in 'C:\Develop\djjb-news-reader\node_modules\xml2js\lib'
I've found a "temporary" hack to make this work here: https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/4227#issuecomment-310811078
You can also use window.require('fs')
or any other node module, that should work
Did you try it?
I tried that and I still get Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'fs' in '..../node_modules/handlebars/lib';
I guess it depends how your lib imports its dependencies, it works for electron and fs, but I just tried rxdb and the "pouchdb-adapter-localstorage" that imports "stream" fails :(
My issue was solved by using npm install events buffer stream timers --save
Tip found here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50234196/after-updating-from-angular-5-to-6-i-keep-getting-the-error-cant-resolve-timer
Same error here with fs and lokijs
Same error with path here
Same here with path
or fs
and other node modules for a browser application. Some external dependencies require these modules (and check they exist at runtime) so we cannot upgrade our application to Angular 6.
These changes in this commit seem to be responsible for it: https://github.com/angular/devkit/commit/8e7658aabc71829153e0dfccf60cc526142a16dd#diff-085e357d25d94ae495a662c157178fb0L103
This should be address as soon as possible. It blocks many people on ng6 upgrade.
In my case with handlebarjs, I imported handlebarjs.js in angular.json instead of using an import in my code. Not very sexy but at least it works.
By the way this is the reasoning behind this change https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/9827#issuecomment-369578814 and the relevant PR https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/pull/9812 that is later ported in https://github.com/angular/devkit/commit/8e7658aabc71829153e0dfccf60cc526142a16dd#diff-085e357d25d94ae495a662c157178fb0L103
I really hope there would be a reasonable solution - for now the best I can figure out is an option to override / supplement webpack configuration so that nodejs shimming can be defined per project.
Workaround (the best one I found, thanks @niespodd): https://gist.github.com/niespodd/1fa82da6f8c901d1c33d2fcbb762947d
Workaround: I've found a workaround that works for me: I downgraded angular-cli
to version 1.7.4
and use there ng eject
(which works for Angular 6 surprisingly). and then adjust webpack.config.js
accordingly.
Great you find a fix for you
I'm not a huge fan of downgrading to CLI 1.7.4. And using eject just because of that issue doesn't look a good solution. Now you are stuck outside CLI. I hope it will be fix soon.
@smoke I completely understand the reasoning behind the change. But I don't understand why the Angular-CLI team did not provide a workaround (like an override option for example). We have 10 dependencies that rely on node modules (fs
, path
etc). How are we supposed to do? Fix all the dependencies ourselves? Staying on Angular CLI 1.7? Waiting an eject option?
I am very thankful to the Angular team to provide us an awesome framework with helpful tools (:heart:), but I spent many hours of my free time just to upgrade 1 element (Angular) of our application... and finally realize that we are at a dead end.
Maybe going back to Angular CLI 1.7 is the best solution for now, but please think about developers that just want to upgrade their application without running into a wall :)
My current (hacky) workaround is running this as a postinstall script:
sed -i 's/require("path")/require("something-i-know-exists")/g' node_modules/some-package/file-error-is-in.js
In my case I don't use the node import that errors because my code only runs in a browser. So it can import the wrong package but who cares. This allows me to keep using the cli without ejecting webpack. It is of course a horrible, horrible hack.
I have placed one good workaround in my post https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/10681#issuecomment-389160125
I've upgraded my application into Angularv6 and rxjsv6 succesfully.
After I upgrade from 1.7.4 to 6.0.5, I start getting similar messages to:
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'stream' in
I execute:
npm install stream events buffer asn1 timers vm --save
And the application compiles. When rendering the app on browser the first error is:
Uncaught ReferenceError: global is not defined
at Object../node_modules/buffer/index.js (index.js:43)
Which I fix by adding: (window as any).global = window; in polyfills.ts file.
Then I get:
ReferenceError: global is not defined
at Object../node_modules/buffer/index.js (index.js:43)>
TypeError: Cannot read property 'prototype' of undefined
at inherits (inherits_browser.js:5)
at Object../node_modules/hash-base/index.js (index.js:23)
at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:76)
at Object../node_modules/md5.js/index.js (index.js:3)
at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:76)
at Object../node_modules/create-hash/browser.js (browser.js:3)
at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:76)
at Object../node_modules/crypto-browserify/index.js (index.js:4)
at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:76)
And now I don't know how to proceed...
const fs = (<any>window).require("fs");
works for me on renderer side without any other modifications (angular5/6).
No build-time checks though.
@Pilukina How did you fix that issue?
I'm facing the same problem after the update.
My problem was the same:
ERROR in ./node_modules/....js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'os' in '.../node_modules/...'
It helps me: https://github.com/browserify/browserify-handbook#browser-field
We've added browser
field in package (fortunately it was our package) that causes an error
"browser": {
"fs": false,
"path": false,
"os": false
}
just like here https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/blob/master/package.json
using webpack ... https://github.com/jeremyfa/yaml.js/issues/102#issuecomment-367229834
I have the same problems with electron and angular 6, I added:
"browser": {
"fs": false,
"path": false,
"os": false
}
as @slawiko suggested, on electron package.json and everything worked fine, but this is a workaround only, there should be a fix in order to solve this.
Why are people patching node_modules? This can be solved using tsconfig paths instead. Please see my PR to PeerTube for an example: https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube/pull/742
EDIT: OK this has problems with the final build, even though it works for dev build :-\
EDIT 2: Never mind, the production build succeeds, I was on the wrong branch. This appears to be a good solution to this issue.
Thanks @rezonant , that fixed it for me. I don't like patching node_modules
either. My issue was only with fs
being used by yamljs
. I'm on Angular 6.0.4, CLI 6.0.7, Node 10.4.0, npm 6.1.0, yarn 1.7.0. Unfortunately, @slawiko 's workaround didn't work for me. I did the following:
package.json
:
{
"scripts": {
"postinstall": "npm rebuild node-sass"
}
}
tsconfig.json
:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"paths": {
"fs": [ "./global-shims" ]
}
}
}
Then, in a global-shims.ts
file:
(window as any).global = window;
export const NOOP = 0;
I'm sorry to say that we do not have support for the Electron platform currently in Angular CLI. We only support building browser apps, and while building browser apps the node native imports (like fs
) are not available. You can read more about why we disabled these imports in https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/9827.
We do not need support for Electron. We only need the compiler to not fail when we include libraries which have been badly written to require fs for some marginal functionality which we wont be using from them. When you started enforcing this in 6 you made a serious breaking change which could be easily avoided if you allowed us to go around this and avoid the compiler error.
@filipesilva isn't the CLI supposed to support angular universal, which could use the same node APIs that electron uses?
Just found this https://github.com/angular-guru/electron-builder (not tested but looks great)
Here's my workaround, works both in ng serve
and ng build
. https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/9827#issuecomment-435350839
Try ngx-electron. It solved issues like this for me.
This should be address as soon as possible. It blocks many people on ng6 upgrade.
In my case with handlebarjs, I imported handlebarjs.js in angular.json instead of using an import in my code. Not very sexy but at least it works.
how imported handlebarjs.js in angular.json
I have the same issue in my React-Redux project.I have use npm install "fs".But when I import * as fs from 'fs',there's a error....
ERROR in ./src/features/pages/myOwnPage/myPage/list.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'fs' in '/Users/xuxiaoqi/Desktop/work/myOwnTest/src/features/pages/myOwnPage/myPage'
I create a new angular project: ng new ngapp1.
vesion:
Angular CLI:8.0.2
Node: 10.16.0
OS: win32 x64
now, I modify the file : app.component.ts, add some code
import * as fs from 'fs';
console.log(fs);
then I process the cmd: ng serve, I get a isssue:
./src/app/app.component.ts
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'tls' in 'C:\Users\Administrator\ngapp1\src\app'
I think it's a simple issue.but i don't know how to fix it. and i find many people have the same question.
Does anyone can help us?
Give a detailed solution. when anyone else has the same question, we can do by this way.
Thanks.
I struggled with this problem for a long time. But I believe the best way to get around this error once and for all is to use a custom webpack build.
I'm using this angular-builder to add the custom webpack config.
After adding the builder, if you're targeting electron you can do something like this:-
module.exports = {
...
output: {
globalObject: 'self',
filename: '[name].bundle.js',
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist')
},
target: 'electron-renderer'
}
If you're targeting web, you can do something like this:-
module.exports = {
...
target: 'web',
node: { fs: 'empty' }
}
This is not a perfect config, but once you add webpack to the build process, the world opens up to you for your specific use cases. Simply move to stack overflow to find an answer.
I've tested this builder with angular version 6, 7, 8 without any problems.
Update: Solved with help from SO Answer
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.
Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.
_This action has been performed automatically by a bot._
Most helpful comment
We do not need support for Electron. We only need the compiler to not fail when we include libraries which have been badly written to require fs for some marginal functionality which we wont be using from them. When you started enforcing this in 6 you made a serious breaking change which could be easily avoided if you allowed us to go around this and avoid the compiler error.