When we look at iOS with iPhoto and iCloud for example, it becomes very clear that instant upload is basically a hack to one-way push the photos from your mobile phone onto your computer.
But what happens if you modify them on the computer?
What you really want is simple two-way-sync. Hook up the pictures once and then it鈥檚 just all synced. How can we achieve that @nextcloud/android? Anything with the new instant upload implementation which helps us on that front?
(cc @xMartin cause we talked about that)
No implementation done yet, but two way sync is part of the auto upload Roadmap #285
So, you want to sync the photos back into the Android file system (outside of the internal Nextcloud folder storage)? I think your Apple use case does not apply to Android, because for editing, Apple provides software on both ends, iOS and macOS, and mirror the editing capabilities.
I would be furios, if my "originals" would be overwritten, but we have to think about "new" edited photos placed in the same folder as the uploaded ones, I guess.
@AndyScherzinger and I discussed the various sync problematics and we would like to introduce a cache quota, like on Spotify. Where would be the right place to discuss the particularities... existing/new issue?
I think a new issue would be best :)
@eppfel why not let the user decide what he want? I think every user should configure which sync type he prefers.
@bes1002t adding new options isn't always the answer. It'd be better if we could figure out a solution for everyone without adding more settings.
Not necessarily saying that's the right way here (though it might be), just that the knee-jerk "make it configurable" isn't always the best.
@strugee yes you're totally right, it's not the solution to every problem. But everybody prefers a different way to sync their information. I think it's not userfriendly to say "do it like we want!"
Neither is it user frierndly to have to wade through 1000 options to get the same result that most other people want.
Most helpful comment
@bes1002t adding new options isn't always the answer. It'd be better if we could figure out a solution for everyone without adding more settings.
Not necessarily saying that's the right way here (though it might be), just that the knee-jerk "make it configurable" isn't always the best.