Apache Airflow version: 1.10.12
What happened:
$ airflow test [dag_id] [execution_date]
gives
usage: airflow test [-h] [-sd SUBDIR] [-dr] [-tp TASK_PARAMS] [-pm]
dag_id task_id execution_date
positional arguments:
dag_id The id of the dag
task_id The id of the task
execution_date The execution date of the DAG
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-sd SUBDIR, --subdir SUBDIR
File location or directory from which to look for the
dag. Defaults to '[AIRFLOW_HOME]/dags' where
[AIRFLOW_HOME] is the value you set for 'AIRFLOW_HOME'
config you set in 'airflow.cfg'
-dr, --dry_run Perform a dry run for each task. Only renders Template
Fields for each task, nothing else
-tp TASK_PARAMS, --task_params TASK_PARAMS
Sends a JSON params dict to the task
-pm, --post_mortem Open debugger on uncaught exception
airflow test command error: the following arguments are required: execution_date, see help above.
What you expected to happen:
That test should be run on DAG level, i.e., each task, in accordance to documentation:
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/tutorial.html#id2
How to reproduce it:
$ airflow test [dag_id] [execution_date]
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
Not a bug.
Read the usage instructions again.
You're omitting the mandatory task_id.
Follow the tutorial, it includes task_id.
The same applies to airflow test [dag_id] [execution_date], but on a DAG level. It performs a single DAG run of the given DAG id. While it does take task dependencies into account, no state is registered in the database. It is convenient for locally testing a full run of your DAG, given that e.g. if one of your tasks expects data at some location, it is available.
This piece of documentation is invalid. Testing the entire DAG is a feature exclusive to Airflow 2.0
PR to update docs on the 1.10 release branch https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11191
Not a bug.
Read the usage instructions again.
You're omitting the mandatory task_id.
Follow the tutorial, it includes task_id.
I am following the documentation, but it is wrong. Thats my whole point...
Doc's will be updated for next release.
Most helpful comment
Doc's will be updated for next release.