@fafhrd91 and I suggest to give @pfreixes write access to the repo.
Hi improved DNS caching very much as well as other minor contributions.
His initiative for client tracing support is amazing.
Let's vote:
-1 for strong objection
+-0 for not sure
+1 for definitely yes
Vote is finishing in a week at 2017-10-26
+0
+1
The vote has finished.
I see no objections.
Welcome, @pfreixes
Thanks, I will try to do my best to help you guys!
馃帀 @pfreixes 馃帀
do you have any protocol about the number of reviewers needed to accept a PR?
I'm not aware about such, but one so far is enough. But you can always call for more if you want to gather more feedback.
May be so project by law would be nice to have to make such processes transparent and clear.
No, our team is not such big to require 2-3 reviewers.
I don't follow the note about transparency, sorry.
@asvetlov I was referenced in my mind to document like this that we have in CouchDB. It detaily describe how project processes works. Quite handy for newcomers.
Looks pretty good!
Would you contribute something like this into our documentation?
welcome @pfreixes.
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a [new issue] for related bugs.
If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion, please include those exceprts into that [new issue].
Most helpful comment
No, our team is not such big to require 2-3 reviewers.
I don't follow the note about transparency, sorry.