Afnetworking: appstore审核提示用了UIWebView的api，被拒绝

[tfy87happy]

ITMS-90809: Deprecated API Usage - Apple will stop accepting submissions of apps that use UIWebView APIs . See https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiwebview for more information.
请问能更新代码把UIWebView分类去掉么

[453548460Anders]

我也刚刚遇到这个问题

[spraveenk91]

We don't see any of the pull requests has been approved to fix this issue? When can we expect to see this issue to be resolved?

Any ideas @kcharwood @mattt @Kaspik

[JinfengLi888]

I've also received the same warning from Apple. When shall we fix this issue?

From Apple:

Dear Developer,We identified one or more issues with a recent delivery for your app, Your delivery was successful, but you may wish to correct the following issues in your next delivery:ITMS-90809: Deprecated API Usage - Apple will stop accepting submissions of apps that use UIWebView APIs . See https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiwebview for more information.After you've corrected the issues, you can use Xcode or Application Loader to upload a new binary to App Store Connect.

[leviduan]

It's just a warning, I can upload my app with the warning.

[b593771943]

It's just a warning, I can upload my app with the warning.

But I am afraid that manual review will be affected,I've heard that some people have been turned down for this warning

[tikamsingh]

Is anybody got approved from apple reviewer with this warning?

[daniusite]

我也收到了,不知道苹果是怎么检测的

[anish190]

I got my app approved last week with UIWebview. But I am working on replacing UIWebView with WKWebView for upcoming release.

[snow-nwh]

I delete the UIWebView+AFNetworkingcategory , but it seems not working.

[Antduo]

only a warning, our app has been reviewed.

[anurajl]

@Xianyus As of now, Apple won't reject the build. But going forward this needs to be addressed.

[tjanela]

Hey everybody, #4439 is available and passing all CI tests. We have one dependency on one of our projects that uses this lib so we would like to see this addressed and a new version of AFNetworking pushed out.
Does anybody here have a direct comm channel with one of the maintainers?
Thanks!

[Daemonson]

Hey everybody, #4439 is available and passing all CI tests. We have one dependency on one of our projects that uses this lib so we would like to see this addressed and a new version of AFNetworking pushed out.
Does anybody here have a direct comm channel with one of the maintainers?
Thanks!

From the information on the release page，some of the latest release versions were released by SlaunchaMan，maybe @SlaunchaMan can help release a new version.

[tjanela]

Thank you @Daemonson, I'm going to reach out to @SlaunchaMan and see what needs to be done to push #4439 out.

[anurajl]

@tjanela Any update from SlaunchaMan on this?

[sunKit-io]

AFNetworkin , BlockKit 删除其中的分类即可

[tjanela]

@tjanela Any update from SlaunchaMan on this?

No, haven't heard back from any of the listed maintainers, nor from the Alamofire team.

[fgarciaDev]

Still no traction on this? Looks like #4439 is close.

[tjanela]

@knarf74, things are pretty close. I managed to break #4439 into digestible chunks as requested by the maintainers. It’s up to them now.

[jacekdogiel]

Why is this taking so long?

[sunKit-io]

这个只是警告，并不会影响正常上线，我们的APP 已经审核通过了

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Jacek Dogiel"<[email protected]>;
发送时间: 2019年10月31日(星期四) 下午4:50
收件人: "AFNetworking/AFNetworking"<[email protected]>;
抄送: "Casper ????????"<[email protected]>; "Comment"<[email protected]>;
主题: Re: [AFNetworking/AFNetworking] appstore审核提示用了UIWebView的api，被拒绝 (#4436)

Why is this taking so long?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[fgarciaDev]

@tjanela still not looking good. lost traction with #4439?

[tjanela]

Hey @knarf74, it seems like @jshier got his attention steered elsewhere.
I would love to see this #4439 released, as the community has invested in this a lot.
Despite the warning around AFNetworking being replaced by newer approaches, it is still widely used and, as such, would warrant some form of LTS. I guess it's either maintaining our own forks or waiting for a release.

[tjanela]

See #4439

[Kaspik]

Updated, released. Can be closed.